Panchkula Stilt-Plus-Four-Floor Policy Controversy Sparks Legal Action
The Panchkula Citizen Welfare Association (CWA) is preparing to file a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Punjab and Haryana High Court against the state government’s stilt-plus-four-floor policy.This policy, which has sparked significant controversy, was approved by the Haryana government in 2017 by amending the Haryana Building Code. Despite public opposition and suggestions, the policy was reinstated on July 1, 2024, after being temporarily rolled back in February 2023.
CWA President S.K. Nayyar, during a meeting at Red Bishop in Sector 1, expressed frustration over the government’s disregard for the residents’ concerns. “We have put in our best efforts by meeting the Chief Minister, other ministers, and concerned officers, but to no avail,” he said. The association is now mobilizing funds and support from both direct and indirect sufferers to challenge the policy legally.
The Panchkula stilt-plus-four-floor policy controversy has seen widespread protests from residents who claim the policy caters to the builder lobby at the expense of public welfare. Residents like Pramod Hans and J.L. Nanda have reported severe structural damages to their homes due to adjacent stilt-plus-four constructions. Hans alleges that the Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) survey team grossly underestimates the damage costs, while Nanda fears for the safety of his home due to severe wall cracks.
Elderly residents, such as 90-year-old B.S. Bhandari, face daily struggles, including threats from neighbors and the physical challenge of visiting government offices to seek redressal. The Panchkula stilt-plus-four-floor policy controversy has left many feeling vulnerable and neglected.
The policy was initially introduced to address housing shortages by allowing more floors per building, potentially stabilizing property prices. However, critics argue that it exacerbates issues like inadequate sewerage, water supply, electricity, parking, and traffic management, particularly in older sectors with narrow lanes.
Former Army Chief General V.P. Malik has been a vocal critic, labeling the policy “illogical” and detrimental to the community. He initiated a signature campaign and highlighted the adverse effects on infrastructure, privacy, and the environment. Malik and other residents argue that the policy will lead to long-term suffering due to poor sunlight, lack of privacy, and other ecological concerns.
As the Panchkula stilt-plus-four-floor policy controversy continues to unfold, the CWA and affected residents remain determined to fight for their rights. They hope that their legal and civic actions will prompt the government to reconsider the policy and address the community’s grievances.
Read more: UP RERA QR Code: Enhancing Transparency in Real Estate Projects
for more updates follow us on instagram
